Basic indoctrination is that sin is Blame -> Wrong/Failure -> Guilt
-> Justification/Excuse/Apology -> Restraint -> Involvement with
Sympathy -> Occlusion and Disability.

     The purpose of auditing is to spot and run the blame guilt cycles
and the earlier denial of responsibility for all efforts on all dynamics
in that area as our own whether they were or not.

     "Willingness to PUT IT THERE" disenages the bank response and build
up to any counter effort that one thereby takes full responsibility for
as one's own.

     One can only change what one is willing and able to PUT THERE, and
that is the only path back to full OT in one's own universe, the
universe of other's, and ultimately the shared MEST universe.


     "Spot something."

     "Are you willing and able to put it there and leave it be for a


Homer Wilson Smith   Clean Air, Clear Water,    Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959       A Green Earth, and Peace,  Internet, Ithaca NY  Is that too much to ask?

On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, wrote:

> Hash: SHA1
> Rogers ( wrote:
>> Looking back, I'm still not sure I have ALL the facets that contributed to
>> that poor result, but I think the main one was that the correction list was
>> being used as a substitute for the auditor!  I mean, the auditor was using
>> it as a substitute for ARC or basic auditing skill or something.
>     Or something.
>     Sometimes I feel that if I had to do it all over again, I would
> want a LOT of up front indoctrination in what I already know, so I
> have some clue as what I am trying to handle.
>     Hubbard wasted so many pages saying absolutely nothing of worth,
> compared to my present reality on who and what I am and where I came
> from and where I/we/Us are going.
>     Oh I suppose he said it all somewhere, but boy was it filtered
> through a dry and boring filter.
>     Lack of a clear understanding of an ideal scene, the being is
> very hard to audit, too introverted into trying to become better like
> mama wanted him to be.  Ask him what he really wants, and he doesn't
> actually know any more.
>     So how can you ask him what the problems are when the goals and
> ideals are gone to him?
>     A little good indocrination goes a long ways to make a pc
> sessionable.
>     Homer
> ================ ====================
> Wed Sep 12 03:06:02 EDT 2012
> Send mail to saying help
> ================== ===================
> Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
> Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
> Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
> Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning, but
> not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)
> UqUgMXiOYa04Ct4pyRAKYWQ=
> =aZ8h
> _______________________________________________
> Homerwsmith-l mailing list
Wed Sep 12 16:34:01 EDT 2012