ELEMENTALS

    It comes mostly from Theosophy, CW Leadbeater, Anne Besant etc.

    Once you understand that EVERYTHING is a being, and every organization
of things is another being, it is pretty much self evident.

    Beings love to incarnate, they hate having to do it again and again, so 
a being will incarnate as a quark, atom, molecule or crystal in a rock, 
then another will come and be the whole rock, and another will be the 
mountain the rock is on etc.

    Every organization of anything is a post hole (as in org board)
to be occupied by someone that wants and is able to do the job.

    What exactly the elemental's job is, is unclear but it has conscious
will and volition if not self awareness and can do whatever dance is
needed to keep the physical avatar going and doing its physical thing.

    Remember the physical universe does not exist, its a hallucinated 
rendition in consciousness, each rendered part of which is an avatar 
REPRESENTING an actual physical object that might have existed but 
doesn't.

    Thus even a pocket watch which is clearly 100 percent mechanical,
depends on a being to 'keep it going', and other beings to be every
part in it and ever part in them etc.

    Beings organize around FUNCTIONALITY.  Thus a part of a part, if it has 
no different functionality than the bigger part it is a part of, may not 
be enough of a post hole, for a being to fill.

    The being's role is mostly in KEEPING THE PART THERE, and then make it 
perform its physical function.

    Two electrons repelling in space, two beings, one for each electron, 
rendering an avatar for their electron, and repelling as they have 
'agreed' to do by filling the post hole of an electron in search of a 
conscious unit to keep it rendered and functional for the rest of time.

    There is no cause between two electrons in the virtual space, because 
they are not actual electrons in actual space, they are conscious pictures 
of electrons in conscious pictures of space (which doesn't take up any 
space!)

    But the beings who are rendering each electron are certainly causally 
connected, and so they can make the electrons dance as they should.

    Since (virtual) physical causality takes place mostly at the 
fundamental level of electrons etc, one can ask why the wheel of a watch 
would need another being, as its functionality is entirely that of the 
electrons on its surface.

    If one believes that the whole is always the sum of its parts,
the question is valid.

    It would be odd to even consider that a heart could do something
that wasn't an absolute function of the cells it was made from.

    Modern science does not have it all figured out, as they are relegating
consciousness itself to chemistry as if chemicals can hurt.

    That's like saying the rendering screen is made of things that
are rendered in it.

    Homer

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith   Clean Air, Clear Water,    Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959       A Green Earth, and Peace,  Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com  Is that too much to ask?   http://www.lightlink.com

On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Thaddeus Slamp wrote:

> Has any1 in the fz covered it?
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Homer Wilson Smith wrote:
>
>>
>>   Not much is said in Scn by Hubbard per se, other than GE's
>> may not may not be theta of some kind, but its playing a different
>> game of creating bodies, than us thetans are where bodies are
>> used as a prison cell for thetans.
>>
>>   Homer
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>> ------------
>> Homer Wilson Smith   Clean Air, Clear Water,    Art Matrix - Lightlink
>> (607) 277-0959       A Green Earth, and Peace,  Internet, Ithaca NY
>> homer@lightlink.com  Is that too much to ask?   http://www.lightlink.com
>>
>>  On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Thaddeus Slamp wrote:
>>
>> Homer: Can you point me to something (really interested in a complete
>>> treatment of the subject) on the distinction between thetans, and other
>>> classes of beings.  I wish to make sure there is no hole in
>>> my comprehension of Scientology metaphysics.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> call me: (503) 395-8475
>>> Find out about me @ the following  not-entirely  (currently) constantly
>>> evolving site:
>>> http://slarty.pbworks.com/
>>> better searches:http://www.zuula.com/
>>>
>>>
>
>
> -- 
> call me: (503) 395-8475
> Find out about me @ the following  not-entirely  (currently) constantly
> evolving site:
> http://slarty.pbworks.com/
> better searches:http://www.zuula.com/
>
Wed Jun 27 16:07:57 EDT 2012