.ll 72
.fo off
.co on 
.ce ((Editor's comments in double parenthesis - Homer))
.ce ADR - 133
.ce Copyright (C) Homer Wilson Smith
.ce Redistribution rights granted for non commercial purposes
======================================================================== 43
Resent-Date:  Thu, 06 Apr 89 22:57:08 EDT
Resent-From:  "Homer W. Smith" 
Resent-To:    adore-l@ualtavm
Date:         Mon, 13 Mar 89 00:33:36 EST
From:         "Homer W. Smith" 
Subject:      Re: clarity
To:           Parapsychology Discussion Forum 
In-Reply-To:  Message of Sun, 12 Mar 89 23:53:38 EST from 

Old psi-l

----------------------------Original message----------------------------
>Homer:  I am intrigued by your use of the term *present* when referring to
>the 'laws of logic'.  Do you mean to imply that they might have been different
>or that they might change?  Or are you making another point about the law
>of non-contradiction in general????

     No I was being sarcastic.  I was going to make some scathing
remark about female logic, but I am tired of that war.

     If Sarah and Mary want to run their world views with endless
numbers of unconfirmed and conflicting views, that is their business,
as long as they are not allowed to operate any heavy machinery.

     My view is

     IS      is      IS.
     IS      is not  IS NOT.
     IS NOT  is      IS NOT.
     IS NOT  is not  IS.

     Sorry but I am very Aristotelian.  I don't take kindly to
people who can prove you cant prove anything, or those who
say that logic is illogical (by what logic?)

     They are yammering away at the mouth freely while brain is
unconnected to anything of worth.

     Of course the laws of logic have not changed.  Its just that
some women seem to have missed that part of school.
 Homer W. Smith      adore-l@ualtavm      4/06/89*clarity