((Editor's comments in double parenthesis - Homer))


                               ACT - 94
                           7 October 1996

                  Copyright (C) 1996 Homer Wilson Smith
        Redistribution rights granted for non commercial purposes.

      LaMont tells me there is no such thing as an Unauditability.

      Let us hope he is right.

      Be that as it may, the following is presented for your reading

      The way to vanish any mass or condition is to generally replicate
the efforts that went into its creation with full responsibility and

      Make it once, it persists, make it again it releases.

      This not quite accurate but we can describe it this way.

      We work from two major premises in the devising of any auditing

      Premise I.  Conception is both necessary and suffcient to create
any mass or condition, which is then created in the mere conceiving of

      Premise II.  All conceivings and thus all creations are self
vanishing, thus anything that is persisting in time is being repeatedly
conceived and thus repeatedly created again and again in a new unit of

      Thus the way to get rid of any mass or condition is to cease
creating it, NOT to create something else or more to counter it.

      Thus we get the preclear to conceive knowingly what he is already
conceiving unknowingly without knowing it, and once he can conceive and
thus create his condition in its entirety, he can let off on the
conception of it by unconceiving it, and thus the mass or condition will
self vanish.

      An Unauditability is a mass or condition that will not release even
when it is "properly" replicated.

      Theoretically of course this is absurd, however the fact is that a
thetan can WISH for a mass or condition to be unauditable and he can put
much effort, intention and energy into making it unauditable.

      Unless this is spotted, the mass or condition will in fact become
unauditable because the thetan is failing to replicate his own desire
that it be unauditable and the extra efforts he put into it to make sure
it is.

      There are 5 primary factors to any unauditability.

      They are, HOW, WHY, WHEN, WHERE, WHO, and WHAT, in that order of
auditing importance.

      At the bottom of the unauditability will be the WHO or WHAT that
the being is rendering unauditable.

      There will be a WHEN and a WHERE that the incident took place,
including a when and a where the rendering of it unauditable took place.

      There will be WHY the thetan wanted to render it unauditable.  That
means he had a reason that he wanted to never resolve this thing or
release it, a reason to make communication with it and replication of it

      And lastly there will be HOW he rendered the incident unauditable.
These are the exact efforts, forces conceptions and postulates that he
made that produced the masses and conditions that will not release no
matter how much he replicates creating them.

      The HOW is still going on in present time, and the WHY is always
about the future.  He won't know the WHEN, WHERE, WHO or WHAT any more
because they have been rendered unauditable.  That means ANY question
you ask of them will return an I DON'T KNOW or NOTHING THERE.

      However he will be able to get some vague sense of WHY he rendered
the scene unauditable as he is still doing it, and he will certainly be
able to get the HOW he is continuing to render it unauditable in present
time, particularly on the meter.

      It's a convulsive shut down which bars entrance to the incident, he
will have to 'be there' when it happens to begin noticing it at all,
otherwise it happens all day long periodically but escapes him entirely.

      He will first have to go through a stage where he notices it only
AFTER it happens, just after, and he says 'I saw that!'.  Then he will
be start being there WHEN it is happening, then BEFORE.  At that point
he can divert the convulsion and start to run it out and its damage.

      The needle will come alive with stops and falls when he comes
anywhere near the efforts to render an incident unauditable.

      The needle is reading on HOW and WHY, *NOT* on WHEN, WHERE, WHO or

      The HOW and WHY are in present time or the future, the WHEN, WHERE,
WHO and WHAT are in the past.

      The WHY will have something to do with Infinities, Eternalities and
the future.


      The Structure of the mass or condition that is unauditable will be
a standard Grades Stack.  A Grades Stack consists of the following,
listed from earliest to latest:

      Goal                - No Goal
      Communication       - No Communication
      Problem             - No Problem
      Overt               - No Overt
      Withhold            - No Withhold
      Upset               - No Upset
      CO Excused Withhold - No Co Excused Withhold
      Make Wrong          - No Make Wrong
      Power               - No Power
      Auditability        - No Auditability

      He will start off with a Goal opposed by an Opp Goal, leading to an
intention to produce a No Goal of his own goal.

      He will fall down in Communication and denial of Communication,
This will get him into Problems and denial of Problems, which will lead
to Overts and denial of Overts, which will get him into Withholds and
denial of Withholds.  This ends him up in major Motivators and Upsets
which stick to him like glue due to Justification and Restraint on the
earlier items on the Grades Stack.

      The next level down is Co Excused Withholds.

      A Co Excused Withhold is a withheld Overt/Motivator *PAIR*.

      It is an IDENTITY <-> OPP IDENTITY lockup.

      He receives a serious Motivator or Upset in present time, and it
restimulates an earlier Overt or Upset he caused to someone else in the
far distant past when he was being then an identity similar to the
perpetrator in present time.

      His mother tries to kill him in this life as a son, which restims a
time in the past when he as a mother, tried to kill her son.

      This is a problem is between WHATs not WHOs.

      His mother hurts him in this life time, this has nothing to do with
anything he might have done to his mother in this life time, or to the
being who is his present time mother in a previous life or hers.

      It has to do with when he as a son has been hurt by a mother in the
present, which locks up with he as a mother hurting a son in the past.

      He has been hurt EGREGIOUSLY in present time and he does not
complain about it at all.  His computation is:

      "If you forgive me for what I did then, and I will forgive you for
what you did to me just now."

      Both become better left unsaid.

      Before this the Overt was subconsciously queued for confession.
Now, he is not sure he is interested in that any more.

      It is called a CO-EXCUSED WITHHOLD because HE is excusing his
present mother and withholding what his mother did to him now, and
excusing himself for what he did as a mother in the past.

      This results in BOTH earlier Overt and later Motivator sinking into
forgetfulness and oblivion.

      Below this the person will get into defense and offense, commonly
called Make Wrong, and end up in an astounding condition of No Power.

      The result of all this is a No Auditability.


      One approaches this by educating the pc in the above material until
he has a good grasp of it and his good indicators come in.

      Then you run,

      "Is there an unauditability?"

      until the pc can spot one with good reality.  You will probably get
VGI's and a good blow down item on the meter when he finds one.

      Remember he is not going to know what the unauditability is about,
so don't expect him to get an incident at this stage, he will merely
have spotted a significant area of absolute Non Sovereignty, usually a
mass or unwanted condition.

      Then run gently without force,

      "HOW are you making this unauditable"
      "WHY are you making this unauditable"

      until he gets a release.

      If you your pc gets jammed and can't find answers to HOW and WHY,
ask gently:

      "Is that because this is an unauditability?"

      ((This is old and dangerous technology.

      Run instead, in all cases

      "Get the idea of making something unauditable" etc.

      Unauditabilities do not respond to question asking of any kind.))

      If he gets a release end off.

      He may still not be able to spot WHEN, WHERE, WHO or WHAT, but he
will have spotted that there is a HOW and a WHY, and he will begin the
process of reevaluating the WHY to his long term benefit, and in the
meantime he won't be doing the HOW quite so hard.

Thu Jan 28 18:56:27 EST 2016