AM I CLEAR? I often get people asking me if I am clear, including people trying to audit me. Frankly I haven't a clue. You know they have the 'Clear Certainty Rundown' to help clears gain certainty that they are clear, but it seems to me they should also have some kind of 'UnClear Certainty Rundown' so that people who aren't clear can attain some kind of certainty on it. As it is, the C/S takes one look at them and shakes his head and that the end of that. Wonder how many Natural Clears were demoted by non clear C/S's shaking their heads? Anyhow that said, here are my responses to the following. >1950: an unaberrated person. He is rational in that he forms the best >possible solutions he can on the data he has and from his viewpoint. >He obtains the maximum pleasure for the organism, present and future, >as well as for the subjects along the other dynamics. The Clear has >no engrams which can be restimulated to throw out the correctness of >computation by entering hidden and false data in it. Since I am in chonic pain, Black V, don't want to be alive etc, I would say no, I am not clear. >1952: originally this meant a person who no longer was operating >under engram commands, who has been "cleared" of his aberrations. As >of 1952 it is a relative word, and can be applied to persons who have >raised themselves on the tone scale to a level where they have command >of their thinking processes. The ideal clear, of course, would be at >20.0 on the tone scale-a balancing of theta and MEST. As long as they >remained at that point, they would be balanced between full cause and >effect, capable of assuming cause over anything. Hell I am at -30 let alone 20.0 >1954: a person who can have or not have at will anything in the >universe Nope. >1955: simply an awareness of awareness unit which knows it's an >awareness of awareness unit, can create energy at will, and can handle >and control, erase, or re-create an analytical mind or reactive mind. Nope. >1955: somebody who does not have any engrams in present time with >him. By actual practice a Clear would have to be a stable thetan >exterior since the body itself is composed of energy masses which >unfortunately contain engrams Nope. >1957, in an absolute sense would be someone who could confront >anything and everything in past, present and future Nope. >1957: a thetan who can knowingly be at cause over life, matter, >energy, space and time, subjective and objective Nope, not evern MENTAL matter, energy space and time as regards survival for self on the first dynamic. Hell I can't even decide to die, let alone live. >1957: A scientology clear would be able to confront the physical >universe, other bodies, his own body, other minds, his own mind and >other beings-without trimmings Nope, bugs scare the hell out of me, particularly electric spiders. >1958: from the attainment of "Clears" by L. Ron Hubbard. > a person at willing and knowing cause over his own life, his body and >his surroundings and without a reactive or subconscious mind. Nope. >1963: Book One definition holds exactly true. A Clear is somebody >with no "held down fives" in this lifetime No clue, never found a held down 5. Or a 7. >1963: a thetan cleared of enforced and unwanted behavior patterns and >discomforts Nope. >1965: a clear has no vicious reactive mind and operates at total >mental capacity just like the first book said. In fact every early >definition of Clear is found to be correct. Nope. >1966: a clear is not an all knowing being. A clear is somebody who >has lost the mass, energy, space and time connected with the thing >called mind. Nope. >1968: The Dianetic Clear is now called a Release due to total >(Scientology) Clear being so much higher, and total clear, which we >are today making in Scientology is completely out of comparison with >what Dianetics was trying to do. The Dianetic Clear was: an optimum >individual, no longer possessed of any engrams. The Scientology Clear >is a person who can be at cause knowingly and at will over mental >matter, energy, space and time as regards the first dynamic (survival >for self). Nope. A Scientology Clear is a being who has attained this state >by completing the Clearing Course and been declared Clear by the >Qualifications Division. A Scientology Clear is a being who has attined this state by whatever means including drugs. > Dianetics was the route from aberrated or aberrated and ill human, >to capable human, Scientology is the route from human being to total >freedom and total beingness. I am still an ill human. >1968: A thetan (the person himself-not his body or name, his mind or >anything else-that which is aware of being aware) who can be at cause >knowingly and at will over mental matter, energy, space and time as >regards the first dynamic (survival for self). A clear is a being who >has attained this state by completing the Saint Hill Clearing Course >and been declared Clear by the Saint Hill Qualifications Division. Nope. >1968: A person who has completed Grade VII by erasing his whole bank. >He no longer has a reactive mind or time track, and he is again wholly >himself and can follow his own basic purposes. What's a basic purpose? >1970 ?(1) Dianetic Clear: an individual who has been cleared of all >engrams and chains and who has achieved a general tone four; a >Dianetic Case Completion; one who through Dianetic processing has >become free of those things which make a person susceptible to, and >"hold in place", psychosomatic ills, and is a healthy, happy human >being. In this book Clear means Dianetic Clear. I don't even believe in such a thing, and certainly could never imagine such for myself. (2) Scientology >Clear: A person who, having received all the processing gains from >Dianetics to Grade VI (highest Scientology Release Grade), has then >completed the Clearing Course at an Advanced Organization. A >Scientology Clear has by definition the ability to be cause over >mental matter, energy, space and time as regards the First Dynamic. Nope. >1974: Clear (noun), A much misunderstood state of being. The word >has been used before with other meanings. It has been mistaken as an >absolute. It is still used. It is used here as electronics slang and >can apply to a chain, an incident or a computation. I have cleared a few things, I ain't what I was. >1970-1976, ability to be at cause over mental matter, energy, space >and time on the 1st dynamic (survival for self) Nope. >1975: A Clear in an absolute sense would be someone who could >confront anything and everything in the past, present and future Nope. >1976: Clear, Theta, an individual who, as a thetan, is certain of his >identity apart from that of the body, and who habitually operates the >body from outside. Nope. I habitually operate the body from inside its asshole. >1977-1978: a thetan who can be at cause knowingly and at will over >mental matter, energy, space and time as regards the first dynamic >(survival for self). The state of Clear is above the release grades >(all of which are requisite to clearing) and is attained by completion >of the Clearing Course at an Advanced Organization. Nope. >1978: A clear in Dianetics, then is simply one whose engrams and >locks are erased and who does not become confused, obsessed or >impelled by past moments of physical pain. The goal is far, far >beyond anything envisioned by such investigators as Freud. Nope. >1978: It will readily be seen that the ideal condition would be all >theta recovered and no entheta remaining in existence in the >individual. The attainment of this ideal is called in Dianetics a >"cleared" state. This would be, at this time the end goal of >processing. Nope. >1982: The band that achieves in a final burst of glory and freedom, >the state of clear Glory? Freedom? Nope. Sad. >1987: an unaberrated person. He is rational in that he forms the >best possible solutions he can on the data he has and from his >viewpoint. He obtains the maximum pleasure for the organism, present >and future, as well as for the subjects along the other dynamics. No pleasure here... >1991: Now the state of being cleared was what confused the issue. >People wanted to know what they'd be like if they were cleared. A >good question. Data accumulated, but not as fast as the questions. >The people, cleared, would be better, feel better, be more moral, etc. > All that is a matter of record. But the craving for an Absolute >caused everyone to put the state called "OT" in place of the condition >of "being cleared." Absolutes," in our Axioms, "are unobtainable." Ron was dead at this time. OT is not absolute either? >1992: the name of a state achieved through auditing or an individual >who has achieved this state. A Clear is a being who no longer has his >own reactive mind. He is an unaberrated person and is rational in >that he forms the best possible solutions he can on the data he has >and from his viewpoint. Hands money over to the registrar. Ron dead. >1993: A Clear is a person who no longer has his own reactive mind an >therefore suffers none of the ill effects that that the reactive mind >can cause. The Clear has no engrams which, when restimulated, throw >out the correctness of his computations by entering hidden and false >data. Nope. >A Clear is free with his emotions. He can think for himself. He can >experience life unencumbered by inhibitions reactively dictated by >past engrams. Artistry, personal force and individual character are >all residual in the basic personality of the person, not the reactive >mind. Clears are self-confident, happy and generally successful-in >both careers and inter-personal relationships. Nope, life is a disaster seeking oblivion... >1993: A Clear is a person who no longer has his own reactive mind. >He has vanquished it forever. Without the stimulus-response mechanisms >of the reactive mind which can cause a person pain, unwanted >sensations and negative emotions, a Clear can act rather than react. >A Clear has a very high degree of personal integrity and honesty, and >is living proof that man is basically good. His own basic beingness >returns and his own basic personality flourishes. A person loses all >the fears, anxieties and irrational thoughts that were held down by >pain in the reactive mind and, in short, regains himself when he goes >Clear. Forever huh. Right. Negatory on the rest of it. >2003 >From Celebrity Magazine Issue 352 November 2003 WHAT IS A CLEAR? 1) >The reactive mind can cause unknowing and unwanted fears, emotions, >pains and psychosomatic illness that one would be much better off >without. 2) Dianetics can effectively "erase" the contents of the >reactive mind and free a person from its adverse influence. 3) A >person who no longer has his own reactive mind is called a Clear. What >he is left with is all that is really him. THE ATTRIBUTES OF CLEAR >Clear is a state that has never before been attainable in man's >history. A Clear possesses attributes, fundamental and inherent, but >not always available in an uncleared state, which have not been >suspected of man and are not included in past discussions of his >abilities and behavior. The Clear is: Freed from active or potential >psychosomatic illness or aberration Self-determined Vigorous and >persistent Unrepressed Able to perceive, recall, imagine, create and >compute at a high level above the norm Stable mentally Free with his >emotion Able to enjoy life Freer from accidents Healthier Able to >reason swiftly Able to react quickly Nope. So am I clear? Well no one in their right mind would say so. But you know it is possible for a clear to get so bogged down in OTHERS banks, BT's and Clusters, even use their incidents for Service Facsimiles of his own, that even though he doesn't have a bank of his own, he's still got a bank, hundreds in fact, and still acts like a Homo Sap before Dianetics, Black V, invisible, all black, dub-in and all. It's happened you know. Homer Thu May 19 17:36:52 EDT 2016