It turns out things are more serious than I thought.

     Your average human being is suffering PTSD just from being alive,
based on

     "What ever you can get you can't keep, you can have it for a while, 
but then you must lose it forever."

     This leads to "better not get" so you don't end up in "don't have


Homer Wilson Smith   Clean Air, Clear Water,    Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959       A Green Earth, and Peace,  Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com  Is that too much to ask?   http://www.lightlink.com

On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, homer@lightlink.com wrote:

> Hash: SHA1
> JEANETTE ROGERS (HERE-I-YAM@email.msn.com) wrote:
>> Homer Wilson Smith wrote:
>> Hi Homer,
>> I'm afraid much of the above is over my head.  I couldn't quite relate to
>> it.
>    Sure you can, remember a time you 'will *NEVER* forgive' someone.
>     That's a forever and thus a dramatization, it brings DRAMA to a
> situation rather than peace, vanishment and void.
>> But one thing for sure, there definitely is something wrong with "forever."
>> It seems to be a bit late on the track to be really basic, more like a 3rd
>> postulate or something.
>     It's an effort to make sure something NEVER happens again, or
> ALWAYS happens again, its an effort to create a permanent PERSISTENCE.
>     Run
>    "What would it be ok to have be for just a while."
>    "What would it not be ok to have be for just a while."
>> Or, to put it another way, "forever" is possibly all the more devious
>> because it harmonizes with (or is a mockery of) a theta truth.
>     Yes, it is an effort to bring the non temporal eternality of
> static into being as a termporal eternity of MEST.
>     Something forever is hell forever.
>     Nothing forever is death forever.
>     Cycling between something and nothing, manifest and unmanifest
> forever is "fair chosen peace via hell and high water".
>     In other words you can (willingly) have something as long as you
> can have nothing, and you can have nothing as long as you can have
> something, but if you HAVE to have something forever, then you begin
> to seek nothing forever, and if you HAVE to have nothing forever you
> begin to seek something forever, and see saw between the two
> endlessly, life after life.
>     Hell forever - > Death Forever -> Hell forever -> Death forever
>     Meatball -> Christian -> Meatball -> Christian.
>     Homer
> ================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
> Thu Nov 14 12:00:04 EST 2019
> WEB:  http://www.clearing.org
> BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com
> FTP:  ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore3.memo
> Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
> =========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
> Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
> Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
> Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
> Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
> but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
> iD8DBQFdzYgUURT1lqxE3HERAnwDAJ9RdwdvrRVKO9jj3iBcvA0M3G3P7QCfZXC7
> vgScfZ+WpJApH/MbugG72i4=
Thu Nov 14 14:09:33 EST 2019