AUDITING THE BLACK V CASE

     I am sorry I have to disagree with this (at bottom).

     Black V is a VERY sick condition, below death on the tone scale.  It
comes from a postulate that the way to survive is to not look and not BE
ABLE to look.

     Any auditing that takes place that does not address the black V
condition directly is auditing AROUND that condition, like trying to reach
around a barrel for what is on the other side.

     Auditing will take place on other things, but the pc is stuck
solidly at the point of the shut off, so one will not be sending
the pc down the track to audit these other things, one will be making
the pc REACH down the track to audit remotely as best he can.

     He will be happy to do this forever, anything but see again.

     In the end he will become an endless auditing case because essentially 
auditing around the Black V condition is no auditing.

     If you can't see, you can't survive, if you can't survive you can't
stay up tone.

     If he thinks seeing means non survival, as a body or as a being,
then you have a problem.  Case gain does not happen across a problem.

     You are trying to make him better, he is trying to be better
at staying worse.

     Homer


- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith     The Paths of Lovers    Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF        Cross            Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com    In the Line of Duty    http://www.lightlink.com

On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, chris@chris-melchior.com wrote:

>
> A couple more comments on "black-5" . . .
>
> It is NOT necessary to view the contents of an incident to erase it.
> One can simply erase persistant-energy forms at a location in
> space-time which comprise the incident, without looking at the
> contents of the incident. So ones ability to view incident contents is
> not relevant to erasing incidents fully.
>
> Secondly, one wasn't a Black-5 at individuation . . . something
> changed at some time after that, probably relatively recently. So
> erase the change to becomming a Black-5, as an incident (it does not
> require viewing the incident data visually, to get the job of erasure
> done). There will also be decisions (erase them with Aspectika),
> SerFacs, Purposes, mental machinery (erase as per L13) and maybe other
> stuff linked to the incident. Erase the incident first, then the other
> linked stuff.
>
>
> Chris
>
> **
> This message was sent to the list selfclearing-l
> The list is for those engaged in using the Pilot's self
> enlightenment book "Self Clearing".
> Send in your comments, questions and answers to others questions.
> **
>
**
This message was sent to the list selfclearing-l
The list is for those engaged in using the Pilot's self
enlightenment book "Self Clearing".
Send in your comments, questions and answers to others questions.
**

Mon Jun  5 13:01:06 EDT 2006

================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
Thu Dec 15 12:06:03 EST 2016
WEB:  http://www.clearing.org
BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.org
FTP:  ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore331.memo
Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body
=========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===============
Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning,
but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFYUs17URT1lqxE3HERAn7lAKC7aY4xe9XdNihiF7U10hfB8QI3mgCeOQdQ
dEOu6UpeFOjDU5SALP+mDRg=
=zhLS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Fri Dec 16 01:41:21 EST 2016