INACTUALITY AWARENESS CHARACTERISTIC SCALE http://clearing.org/archive?/electra/acc.memo Inactuality is the make break point on the pc's case. Above inactuality the pc knows what is wrong with him. Below inactuality he doesn't. Above inactuality, if you ask him what's the matter, he will tell you. Below inactuality, he will give you a confused wrong item. Below oblivion he will tell you 'nothing, life is grand', all the while poisoning pigeons in the park. Inactuality is the nail point below which the God Postulate on the pc's case can no longer be changed. He can't change it simply and only because he no longer knows what it is. It wouldn't be inactual, if he did know what it was! He can't have the problem he's got, so he won't admit what it is, so he's trying to change SOMETHING ELSE, some other problem which he can have, which is an alter-is and results in more persistence of both. A God Postulate is that postulate which the pc thinks is true because he has observed it to be true, when in fact it is true only because he considers it is true. God postulates are created by taking the true sequence which is consideration -> observation and turning it around into observation -> consideration The observation acts as proof that the consideration is true independent of the consideration. Before the flip, considerations are cause and observations are effect. Considerations cause things to be, and then you verify they match your original intent with observation. After the flip, observations are cause, and considerations are the effect. Observations (give rise to) the consideration that something is true because you observed it. His consideration is that a consideration alone could not possibly cause anything. Which is why the pc considers that changing his mind about anything will be fruitless. This is called the Consideration - Observation flip flop. This is also your pc's major upset with himself, that he ever engaged in operating the flip flop on himself, namely his considerations about the powerless of considerations. The humorous cruelty of it escapes him. At any point down to inactuality the pc is able to change his mind on any primary postulate of limitation he has made. That is how one handles a God Postulate, the pc changes his mind and it vanishes. There will be many of them, not infinite, perhaps a countable heavy hand full on a case. The charge on each one however will be 'infinite', finite but without upper limit, filled with forevers and nevers and loss of an infinite number of beautiful eternities etc. Below inactuality the pc no longer knows that the problem is, so he can't change his mind about it. He will consider OTHER things are the problem, and try to change his mind about them, but it won't work, and he will become more convinced that postulates do not work. He tried to change his postulates about something and it didn't work, no change ensued. That's his observation that postulates did not cause the thing in the first place, and thus changing postulates won't fix it either. This observation he uses as proof that postulates do not work. You see postulates work. If you postulate you can't (do something) then you can't. But that's because you CAN. You see this? The postulate that postulates don't work, works. But a postulate can't be un done without undoing the original true primary postulate on that chain of God postulates. Thus once he has started his permanent personal nose dive below inactuality, any new postulate he makes won't be undoable because he isn't considering that postulates do anything anyhow. All postulates are drawn from observations from there on out. Who the hell knows WHAT is creating reality for him at that point, HE certainly doesn't want to know. If you let something else create reality for you, what gets created? Inactuality is an effort to make nothing of one of the prime incidents on the pc's case. If assessed for duration it will read and indicate as FOREVER. This is because the incident is still going on. He is suffering permanently from the effects of his own postulates. When assessed for when, date, it will read as timeless. When assesed for where, location, it will read as everywhere. He has had it with him for a very long time, and carried it with him to a lot of different places. Trying to find the beginning of this thing is hard. You are trying to bring the pc up above inactuality to disaster. From there it is merely a matter of changing one's mind on the various God postulates found. Each one will go from a lot of struggle and 'I am sunk' to calmness and 'Wow look at that'. Once the prime postulate is found on the chain, the pc can simply be there and change his mind about it and watch it vanish. His first time, his own disbelief will put him on the balance point between persistence and vanishment, but if he just calms the struggle, just sits there with it and watches it persist with the willingness to have it be just for a while (with no limit on how long the while is other than it be finite) truth will win and the condition will start to dissolve. His future on the subject will reverse before his eyes and go from negative to positive. Once a pc gets the hang of this, and comes to UNDERSTAND the mechanism at work, he will be a terror to any case that crosses his path. For most pc's, the actual prime incident on the chain has sunk way below inactuality, down through oblivion ("What case?"), through elation, glee, fixidity, erosion, dispersal, disassociation, criminality, uncausing, disconnection and unexistence. Disconnection is from the story line he was connected to and involved and engaged in. Ever run into someone who was just totally stumpy, they just wouldn't budge no matter what you did or said? That's fixidity on the tone scale. Its a last ditch effort to hold on to existence no matter what. The last effort of a being trying to give is to take. That's criminality on the tone scale and here you will find intentions too dark to countenance. Permission issues abound here, permission to open pandora's box. He knows its not just him that's in trouble but the AllThatIs from the top down. He is going to mess up heaven and hell for EVERYONE and everything if he does it wrong. The only remaining solution for the pc is to disconnect and unexist as a spirit. Good luck. Each God Postulate chain will be found to have nails at least at unexistence, fixidity, oblivion, shock and inactuality. These are the ridge points. Most of the rest are flows and dispersals. Start at inactuality - NO inactuality, and when reads dry up, go downwards until you start to get reads again. NEVER run an item without also running the NO item, and always run the NO item first. Never go past an item without having checked for sync, Continue to the bottom, then come back up once the bottom losens up. The pc won't have a clue what he is running, its all black until the inactuality blows off. But he will recognize his blankness and the blankness of others as a serious indication that something is there and needs to be handled. He also won't be making things worse during the day or sleep any more. Convulsive not-isness, no understanding that something WAS buried, will becomes things of the past. His life will now audit him properly rather than sink him deeper. When you hit the qualms, you are winning. The qualms is 'this might be better to not look at, not know about'. Fear of fear will turn on along with fear of not knowing and fear of knowing. He will put up impossibility, preposterousness, incredibility, no permission and overwhelming shame as last ditch efforts to stay dead. Better to have never loved, than to have loved and lost. Homer - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink (607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.com Tue Aug 15 15:47:47 EDT 2006 ================ http://www.clearing.org ==================== Fri Feb 22 12:00:04 EST 2019 WEB: http://www.clearing.org BLOG: http://adoretheproof.blogspot.com FTP: ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/homer/adore361.memo Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help in body =========== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof =============== Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty. Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect. Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty. Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning, but not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFccCqUURT1lqxE3HERAr9cAKDBgjrSd/zcUFk5sogJkhOffDcvwgCfUkqL RnJTc/l7RRJxFK9Jv2s/QZ4= =xQHJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Fri Feb 22 18:17:32 EST 2019