RUNNING SEPARATION

      This is about the below attached posting by Hubbard.

      Better to run,

      Get the idea of being separate.

      Get the idea of not being separate.

      Or

      Get the idea of NO separation.
      Get the idea of SOME separation.

      Powerful stuff, the joke is present theory will tell you
that the being is a God Soul, meaning one side of him is God
and the other is the Soul.

      The God sides of all souls is the same God, but the soul side
of each soul is eternally individual.

      Thus we say that the AllThatIS is a Multi I-AM being.

      An infinite number of infinite minds...

      This allows separate souls to interact and share dreams via 
resonation between them, not outwardly through created dreamtime, MEST and 
maya, bit inwardly using the God substrate that connects everyone.

      Homer

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith   Clean Air, Clear Water,    Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959       A Green Earth, and Peace,  Internet, Ithaca NY
homer@lightlink.com  Is that too much to ask?   http://www.lightlink.com

On Mon, 28 Dec 2015, Clearing Archive Roboposter wrote:

>
> R2-48 Separateness
>
> References
> Creation of Human Ability (R2-48)
>
> Description
> This is a key process attacking individuation. In his effort to control, a
> being spreads himself further and further from the universe, and in his
> failures to control, withdraws from things he has attempted to control but
> leaves himself connected with them in terms of "dead energy". Thus we get
> the manifestation "buttered all over the universe."
> This was the process that told me that we are not natively sprung from one
> "common body of theta". If you run separateness, accentuating the
> difference in unity of a being from other beings and things and spaces, he
> continues to gain in tone. If you run this process in reverse, how he is
> the same as, or is connected to various items, he continues to dwindle in
> tone. By handling this latter process, one can press a being down into the
> rock-bottom state of aberrations. We have long known that differentiation
> was the keynote of sanity, and that identification was the basis of
> aberration. This fact is utilized in processing by running separateness.
>
> It can be concluded that the being is an individual separate from every
> other being and that he has never been part of any other being. There are
> many "phony" incidents implanted on the track whereby an individual is made
> to feel that he is a result of an explosion having occurred to a larger
> body. He is also made to feel that he was at one time "whole" and is now
> only a splinter of himself. This is only an effort to reduce him. He has
> always been himself, he will always be himself, down to a time when he is
> entirely identified with this universe, at which time he would not longer
> be himself simply because he would no longer be conscious.
>
> It seems that aberration can only occur by enforcing Basic Truth. Here we
> discover that the individual, being separate, is then forced to be
> separate, and so develops a complex of "the only one" and tries to fend off
> the rest of the universe from himself and finally merges with it, with this
> impossibility of fending it off. All you have to do is accentuate truth and
> force it home as another determinism is order to create an aberration.
> There is some basic truth then, in whatever is wrong with a being, and of
> course the basic wrongness is that he is not a static.
>
> Separateness is best run by having the person out in an open place,
> inhabited by a great many people, as in R2-46 and R2-47.
>
>
> Commands
> "Point out some things from which you are separate."
> "Point out some more things from which you are separate."
>
>
> End Point
> Run the process until a realization occurs, or an ability is regained.
>
> Cautions
> None
>
> ================ http://www.clearing.org ====================
> Mon Dec 28 00:06:02 EST 2015
> ftp://ftp.lightlink.com/pub/archive/christine/Separateness
> Send mail to archive@lightlink.com saying help
> ================== http://www.lightlink.com/theproof ===================
> Learning implies Learning with Certainty or Learning without Certainty.
> Learning across a Distance implies Learning by Being an Effect.
> Learning by Being an Effect implies Learning without Certainty.
> Therefore, Learning with Certainty implies Learning, but
> not by Being an Effect, and not across a Distance.
>
> -- 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Homer Wilson Smith   Clean Air, Clear Water,    Art Matrix - Lightlink
> (607) 277-0959       A Green Earth, and Peace,  Internet, Ithaca NY
> homer@lightlink.com  Is that too much to ask?   http://www.lightlink.com
> _______________________________________________
> Clear-L mailing list
> Clear-L@mailman.lightlink.com
> http://mailman.lightlink.com/mailman/listinfo/clear-l
>
Mon Dec 28 19:34:14 EST 2015