((My comments in double parentheses - Homer)) PAULETTE COOPER, OPERATION FREAKOUT CD - 3 1 April 1976 Church Documents (Court Transcripts) Redistribution rights granted for non commercial purposes. ((PAGE ONE)) 1 April 1976 OPERATION FREAKOUT MAJOR TARGET: To get PC incarcerated in a mental institution or jail, or at least to hit her so hard that she drops her attacks. PRIMARY TARGETS: US B1 NE SEC working in liaison with OPS NAT (if needed). To remove PC from her position of Power so that she cannot attack the C of S. US B1 (WF) SEC Taking responsibility for the area working in liaison with OPS NAT. Ops NAT responsible for the overall planning of this project, working in liaison with NE SEC ( *** needed for completion successfully of this Op). OPS NAT responsible for any debugging of this project, necessary. NE SEC and AG/I NY organization operating (with Info power pushing TGTS through to completion). VITAL TARGETS: 1) To recruit an FSM that looks like PC and to train her on this action. (AG/I NY) 2) To recruit an observation FSM to make a telephone call. No special requirements necessary except security. (And not PTS, AG/I NY) 3) To get "Pin Ball" FSMs or T.M. FSM to get familiar with PC to find out some of her clothes she wears particularly what sort of coat she usually wears and her general looks, hair etc. Also above FSM or FSMs will have to meet with PC when the OP goes down. (If possible, tell FSM to get a piece of PC's clothing, AG/I NY) 4) To get a cheap coat that is very similar to PC's. (AG/I NY) 5) To ascertain what PC looks like now, hair streaked? still skinny? etc. (AG/I NY) 6) To locate a laundry near PC's place and to make sure she isn't known there. (Cleaners, note must have clerk, AG/I NY) 7) To find out what PC is wearing the day of this action. And what her hair is like. (AG/I NY) 8) To have someone available to stake out PC when she leaves her place the day of the caper, to ascertain when she leaves, what she's wearing etc. (AG/I NY) *********************************************************************** ((PAGE TWO)) Operation Freakout, a plan to incarcerate (in jail or a mental institution) "PC" or "Mrs. Lovely" their frequent code name for Paulette Cooper. These pages consist of sample bomb threats by phone and mail which are supposed to trace back to her, plus a bizarre scheme to have a Scientologist pose as Cooper and crack up at a store near where she lived so that she would be committed. In 1973, another frame-up scheme with bomb threats lead to the arrest and indictment of Cooper. The lower part of this page consists of a letter attached to Operation Freakout in which they state that they think this frame-up will work because it worked before and the FBI believes she sent those original bomb threats. 1 April 1976 OPERATION FREAKOUT MAJOR TARGET: To get PC incarcerated in a mental institution or jail, or at least to hit her so hard that she drops her attacks. PRIMARY TARGETS: US B1 NE SEC working in liaison with OPS NAT (if needed). To remove PC from her position of Power so that she cannot attack the C of S. RE: PC OP FREAKOUT Dear Dick, SITUATION: Cooper is still not terminately handled. DATA: Cooper is getting her power back, attacking again. Attached is approved Op Freakout. This additional channel (i.e. plan). Should really have her put away. Worked with all the other Channels. The FBI already think she really did do the bomb threats on the C of S (Church of Scientology). SOLUTION: OK this additional Channel. This is OK______ Approved_____ Disapproved_______ Love, Randy (R) ************************************************************************ ((PAGE THREE)) - INTELL TR'S - TR 3 Int- Purpose: To teach a Student Int Officer to get the answer to a question without startling a target. To teach him not to be startled by suspicion and Accusation. Position: Student & Coach facing each other. Commands: No fixed commands. Use 'Start', 'Flunk', & 'That's it' as in other TR's. Training Stress: There are two parts to the drill. (a) The Coach assumes an identity such as Director of a Drug Firm, or Psychiatrist, or PR Man. Coach also picks a question that the student must get answered such as 'What is my address', 'What is my brother's name', 'Have I ever had any connection to FDA'. Coach gives the student a couple of minutes to mock up a suitable cover. Then the drill begins with the student being the interviewer who must get the question answered. Flunks are given for being too pushy. Failing to let Coach Itsa (a silent Int officer invites Itsa), for making the Coach suspicious. Coach gets gradiently tougher and evasive. (b) The coach picks an identity. The student picks a question as above. Flunks are given as in Part (a). If the coach guesses which question the student is trying to get answered (coaches don't go looking for the question but if it sticks out like a sore thumb then Flunk it). Coach is more evasive in this one & Flunks are given for creating suspicion. After the student does this well the coach throws in accusative comments, such 'Who are you working for?' 'You're a Scientologist' 'What are you, a Detective?'. Flunks are given for failing to handle & for becoming startled. This drill is passed when the student can do part (b) of this drill flawlessly. TR 3 INT WITH BULLBAITING Purpose: To teach a student Int Officer to improvise and maintain cover when confronted with something unexpected. Position: Student and coach facing each other. Commands: No fixed commands. Use 'Start', 'Flunk', and 'That's it' as in other TRs. Coach picks an identity. The student mocks up a cover & picks a question he wants answered. The student interviews the coach and must get his question answered. The coach throws in startling accusations and suspicions and the student must handle and maintain his cover. Coach starts off on a gradient giving the student wins. Flunks are given for being startled and long comm lags, for failure to give an answer and smooth over the suspicions of the coach. This is passed when the student can give plausible answers and improvise with ease, so his cover remains intact, and can get an answer to his question. Set up is done as per TR 3 Int (b). Coach is not tough but does give the student many facts. Student departs after terminating the interview. And writes a report on it. Particularly noting whether he got his question answered. The report should include all facts given, but not be overly detailed and include a description of the coach. Flunks are given for, false reports, opinions, evaluation, omitted data, and any other outpoint found in the report not the interview. Mo Budlong DG Info WW ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Homer Wilson Smith This file may be found at homer@rahul.net ftp.rahul.net/pub/homer/act/cd3.memo Posted to usenet newsgroup: alt.clearing.technology